{"id":9652,"date":"2022-08-17T13:06:01","date_gmt":"2022-08-17T16:06:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/singep.org.br\/template\/orientacoes-para-os-avaliadores\/"},"modified":"2026-03-25T21:54:50","modified_gmt":"2026-03-26T00:54:50","slug":"orientacoes-para-os-avaliadores","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/singep.org.br\/14\/en\/orientacoes-para-os-avaliadores\/","title":{"rendered":"Guidelines for Reviewers"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Below are some suggestions for reviewers to do your evaluations:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\u2013 Please note that there are four types of submissions: scientific articles; technological articles\/reports; Technical and Technological Product Reports \u2013 PTT; and posters. Direct your evaluation according to the specific type of submission you receive;
\u2013 Highlight not only the weaknesses of the work, but also its positive aspects;
\u2013 Try not only to point out problems. Offer suggestions on how the author(s) can improve the work;
\u2013 Your evaluation should include both qualitative (minimum of 125 words describing strengths and opportunities for improvement) and quantitative (assigning scores from 1 to 5 for the objectives, methodology, literature, writing, contribution, and relevance of the work) components;
\u2013 The reviewers must aim to be constructive in your review. Keep in mind that this is a paper submitted to a conference and may still be revised for future journal publication;
\u2013 Remember that your evaluation is important to the author(s) and can help them improve their work;
\u2013 Be clear in your comments. Avoid feedback that may confuse the author(s) further;
\u2013 Be respectful in your review. Treat the author(s) the way you would like to be treated;
\u2013 Any sensitive information about the submission that you consider important to address with the theme leaders and organizing committee \u2014 information that should not be shared with the author(s) \u2014 should be included in the \u201cComments restricted to the field coordinator. Use this field to clearly state your final opinion regarding the quality of the paper. Avoid indecisiveness in your impressions of the work;
\u2013 If you believe the paper is strong and ready to be submitted to a journal, recommend it for the fast track. If not, do not make that recommendation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To assist reviewers, we suggest reading the following resources:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Brei, V. A., Farias, S. A. D., Matos, C. A. D., & Mazzon, J. A. (2017). Um guia de avalia\u00e7\u00e3o de artigos cient\u00edficos em marketing. Revista de Administra\u00e7\u00e3o de Empresas, 57<\/em>(4), 391-400. https:\/\/www.scielo.br\/j\/rae\/a\/GTkKgyr7MHcLJ6453xrt4mb\/<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ferreira, M. (2014). Coment\u00e1rio editorial. Como rever um artigo: O papel do revisor e um roteiro para novos revisores. Revista Ibero Americana de Estrat\u00e9gia, 13<\/em>(2), 1-9. https:\/\/periodicos.uninove.br\/riae\/article\/view\/15202\/7398<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ferreira, M. P., Pinto, C. F., & Belfort, A. C. (2016). O que \u00e9 uma boa revis\u00e3o de artigo em administra\u00e7\u00e3o? Revista Eletr\u00f4nica de Estrat\u00e9gia & Neg\u00f3cios, 9<\/em>(2), 88-105.
https:\/\/iconline.ipleiria.pt\/bitstream\/10400.8\/6036\/1\/2016_REEN_boa%20revisao%20de%20artigo.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Martens, C. D. P., Pedron, C. D., & de Oliveira, J. C. (2021). Diretrizes para elabora\u00e7\u00e3o de artigos tecnol\u00f3gicos, artigos aplicados ou relatos t\u00e9cnicos de produ\u00e7\u00e3o com \u00eanfase profissional. Revista Inova\u00e7\u00e3o, Projetos e Tecnologias, 9<\/em>(2), 143-147.
https:\/\/periodicos.uninove.br\/iptec\/article\/view\/21117<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Martens, C. D. P., Scafuto, I. C., Bartholomeu Filho, J., & Zanfelicce, R. L. (2022). Como identificar poss\u00edveis produtos t\u00e9cnicos\/tecnol\u00f3gicos nas disserta\u00e7\u00f5es e teses? Proposta de um instrumento para diagn\u00f3stico. Revista Inova\u00e7\u00e3o, Projetos e Tecnologias, 10<\/em>(1), 1-9. https:\/\/periodicos.uninove.br\/iptec\/article\/view\/22141<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Serra, F. A. R., & Ferreira, M. P. (2015). Proposta de um Modelo para o Instrumento de Avalia\u00e7\u00e3o pelos Pareceristas. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estrat\u00e9gia, 14<\/em>(1), 1-6.
https:\/\/periodicos.uninove.br\/riae\/article\/view\/15568\/7589<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Shigaki, H. B., & Patrus, R. (2016). Avalia\u00e7\u00e3o de artigos cient\u00edficos em administra\u00e7\u00e3o: Crit\u00e9rios e modelos de avaliadores experientes. Teoria e Pr\u00e1tica em Administra\u00e7\u00e3o (TPA), 6<\/em>(2), 107-135.
https:\/\/periodicos.ufpb.br\/index.php\/tpa\/article\/view\/28445<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Video: Capacita\u00e7\u00e3o de novos avaliadores ADI
https:\/\/youtu.be\/vcPnsx3FrlI<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Below are some suggestions for reviewers to do your evaluations: \u2013 Please note that there are four types of submissions: scientific articles; technological articles\/reports; Technical and Technological Product Reports \u2013 PTT; and posters. Direct your evaluation according to the specific type of submission you receive;\u2013 …<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-9652","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","odd"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/singep.org.br\/14\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/9652","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/singep.org.br\/14\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/singep.org.br\/14\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/singep.org.br\/14\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/singep.org.br\/14\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9652"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/singep.org.br\/14\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/9652\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10767,"href":"https:\/\/singep.org.br\/14\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/9652\/revisions\/10767"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/singep.org.br\/14\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9652"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}